天易网

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 4293|回复: 5

法律人的冷漠与自私是人权律师惨遭迫害的根源之一

[复制链接]
发表于 7/5/2011 03:25:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 郭国汀 于 7/5/2011 02:26 编辑

Beijing lawyer Ni Yulan has beenarrested and tortured several times since she began defending people forciblyevicted from their homes in her neighbourhood in the lead up to the 2008Beijing Olympics. She lost her license to practicelaw and was disbarred permanently in 2002 and her own home wasdemolished by the authorities. While in custody, shewas beaten so badly that she is now unable to walk unaided and iswheelchair bound.

Ni Yulan was first arrested in April 2002 when she filmed thedemolition of a client’s home and presented that material as evidence in courtin a forced evictions court case she was representing. The police detained herwithout trial for 75 days. After her release in September 2002, she protestedagainst her illegal detention and was promptly detained again by police inXinjiekou police station, Beijing who beat her so severely on her back and legs that she has been unable to walk without crutchessince.

Recalling the experience, Ni Yulan said in June 2010, “I heard my bonescrack. It was so painful, my mind went blank.” She was charged with “obstructing the performance of official duties”in November and sentenced to one year in prison. During that year, she continued to be tortured and was refused medical treatment for her injuries.79

Nevertheless, she continued to provide legal aid to “high-risk” clients,particularly Falun Gong practitioners and victims of forced eviction. In April2008, the authorities demolished Ni Yulan’s home. When she challenged thelegality of their actions, the police confiscated her crutches and took her tothe Xinjiekou police station, Beijing where they claimed that she had kicked apolice officer in his “lower body” causing him a “testicular contusion”. She was taken to a dark room, beaten and interrogated.They charged her with “obstructing the performanceof official duties” again, and jailed her fortwo years.

During her incarceration, she wasdeprived of her crutches so that she had no choice but to crawl on the floor,up and down the stairs and even onto the toilet. Ni Yulan was finally releasedin April 2010, and had been living in guesthouses and other temporaryaccommodation until, on 7 April 2011 she and her husband Dong Jiqin were detainedby Bejing police. On 13 April, Beijing Xicheng District Public Security Bureau issueda formal notice of Ni Yulan’s detention to her daughter indicating she wasbeing held on suspicion of committing the offence of “pickingquarrels and provoking trouble.” Police issued a similar detentionnotice for Dong Jiqin on 15 April. One month later on 17 May 2011, she alonewas formally charged with the offence. The couple is reportedly held at the Changqiaopolice detention centre in Beijing.80
发表于 7/5/2011 08:03:34 | 显示全部楼层
不只是法律人冷漠,自私。专制统治下人人自危,只扫自家门前雪。运动让我们不敢相信家庭关系,不敢相信朋友关系,不敢相信师生关系。我们曾经被要求主动揭发自己的父母,自己的亲友,自己的老师,自己的领导。中国人民经过了那个疯狂的年代,人性沦丧。

虽然那个年代过去了,可事实上余毒仍在。比如今天的人喜欢扣帽子,我想都是那时候的恶习遗留到现在的结果。而现在,网络封锁那么厉害,人人为求自保而冷漠自私。说起来,根子还在老毛政府搞的一系列的运动那里。什么反右呀,文化大革命呀等等。毛政府危害中国人民太深了,真是罄竹难书的。(不过好象我们很怀念那时候的总理,就有点象现在怀疑我们的总理一样,真是很奇怪的现象,中国是出好总理的国家)。

不能说只有法律人才冷漠才自私,国人大多冷漠与自私,而根子就为了在专制政府里保护自己,也是自保的一种手段吧。

在国内,律师毕竟还是弱势群体。中国政法大学的老师就多次公开提到。确实是的,律师在专制政府里就是弱势群体。你能指望他们人人都成为郭律师那样的人权斗士?要他们都要郭律师那样的牺牲精神?这有点难为他们了。

他们于是苟且活着,有的成为司法腐败的帮凶;有的不满司法腐败,离开律师队伍。有的还在里面苟且活着,为了养家,为了糊口。法律只是他们求生的一种手段而已,断然与更高的法律人的要求无关。制度不改,全中国所有的律师都出来反抗,也没有用。49年后很长的一段时间根本就没有律师呢。专制国度里,律师又能真正做什么呢?
发表于 7/5/2011 08:17:34 | 显示全部楼层
回复 AIFAN 的帖子

是啊,中共的法律只是一个摆设而已,是用来约束普通老百姓的,不是用来约束政府的。律师也是无能为力。不过,最近广西四律师案让我们看到,会不断地有年轻的律师站出来维护同行的权益,也是从根本上维护自己的权益。整个律师行业是一荣俱荣,生死与共的,在中共的山寨国,律师的处境问题是没有地域之分的。
 楼主| 发表于 7/5/2011 17:15:50 | 显示全部楼层
A long-time petitioner (who did not want to benamed) continued to seek out Ni Yulan, even when Ni was detained, due tointense gratitude for having found a person willing to provide legal advice.One week after Ni Yulan and her husband had been taken away by police early morning7 April 2011, this person told Amnesty International:

“I still come to see her place wishing one day she willbe released and will be here to give us legal advice again, because we do notknow where else we can go to seek help. We have suffered so much injustice inour case. We have spent all our money and gone into debt to seek justice inBeijing, but we are like a ball being kicked from one department to another, oftendetained in black jails or beaten while being returned to our hometowns. Ourwhole life has been dragged into the situation, our family is broken apart, andhas become so poor. This lawyer gave us hope, we also send her clothes and foodto support her since she lost the use of her legs due to helping people likeus, she was imprisoned and forced to live on the streets… There is no justicein China, the law is just paper, or it protects the people in power, it doesnothing for the vulnerable and poor like us. We were lucky to find that thereare still a few conscientious lawyers, but their situation is as poor as oursnowadays….”104
 楼主| 发表于 7/5/2011 17:33:09 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 郭国汀 于 7/10/2016 09:48 编辑
AIFAN 发表于 7/5/2011 07:03
不只是法律人冷漠,自私。专制统治下人人自危,只扫自家门前雪。运动让我们不敢相信家庭关系,不敢相信朋友 ...

根本原因是中共极权暴政本身,法律人的冷漠与自私也是原因之一;正因为此种漠与自私,使之对人权律师的奋斗与牺牲不闻不问,从而纵容鼓励了流氓暴政的猖獗;因为法律人是最懂法律的,当然知道是非对错,他们皆明知暴政的荒谬绝伦,却装聋作哑对为真正的法治而奋战牺牲的同行不闻不问,没有任何理由可以作借口。正由于仅有极少数人勇于牺牲,才使得中共暴政日益疯狂迫害人权律师。绝大多数法律人,皆被阉割或自宫不成其人了。我从未要求人们象我一样不顾一切,而仅是要求法律人多关心帮助支持正在奋斗牺牲的人权律师们,那怕仅仅是匿名的道义支持!

 楼主| 发表于 7/5/2011 17:40:50 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 郭国汀 于 7/10/2016 09:51 编辑
郭继明 发表于 7/5/2011 07:17
回复 AIFAN 的帖子

是啊,中共的法律只是一个摆设而已,是用来约束普通老百姓的,不是用来约束政府的。律 ...

律师行业必须自治才有救,在未实现自治之前,律师们必须团结互助;若大多数律师能团结互助,共产党暴政绝对不可能如此猖獗疯狂。极权暴政下律师的力量和作用确实被极大限制,但暴政决不会自动垮台,若更多的律师们真正觉醒,不甘做奴隶,其潜能巨大远超过一般人想象。任何社会变革,法律人首当其冲。如果连法律人都死气沉沉,可以断言,此种社会是没救的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则


站内文章仅为网友提供更多信息,不代表本网站同意其说法或描述,也不构成任何建议。本网站仅为网友提供交流平台,对网友自由上传的文字和图片等,本网站
不为其版权和内容等负责。站内部分内容转载自其它社区、论坛或各种媒体,有些原作者未知。如您认为站内的某些内容属侵权,请及时与我们联络并进行处理。
关于我们|隐私政策|免责条款|版权声明|网站导航|帮助中心
道至大 道天成

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|联系我们|天易综合网 (Twitter@wolfaxcom)

GMT-5, 8/18/2018 13:34 , Processed in 0.109752 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright 天易网 network. All Rights Reserved.

© 2009-2015 .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表