天易网

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1008|回复: 1

[国学论道] 传统中国文化与中共罪恶/ 郭国汀

[复制链接]
发表于 2/17/2017 16:02:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
传统中国文化与中共罪恶/ 郭国汀


陈kai之错误在于混淆了是非,误将中共与中国混为一谈,将主要罪责推委给中国传统文化,甚至中国人中国语言,这明显属似是而非严重误导公众的谬论。东方文明严格说来主要由中国和印度文明组成,日本文明实质上源于中国文明,但自1860年代被美国人强行开关以后,日本人痛下决心学习西洋,很快便超越大多数西方国家。台湾人主体是福建人70%,客家人13%,及随蒋到台湾的其他大陆各省人13%及不到4%的土著,因此,台湾文化主流其实属中国文明,但台湾人吸取了日本文化,美国文化和荷兰文化,同时又保留了纯正的中华文化,因此目前台湾文明的水准要远远高于大陆。


西方文明主要传承自古希腊罗马文明,其源头则在古埃及和中东,基督教与伊斯兰教文明,两者其实属兄弟关系;中国文明由于过份早熟与英国文明最接近,英国政治哲学家边沁之utilitianism 中国译之为功利主义(原意是指“为最大多数人的最大利益”,译成功利主义后,绝大多数中国人其实并不知道“功利主义”的原始真意),英国人的思维方式与中国人的务实思维相当接近。德国人长于周密的理性思辩,法国人擅长理想逻辑,英国人则偏重实际实务,因此有上海人最接近英国人的思维之说。


因为中国文明属世俗文明,西方希腊罗马加信奉唯一真神的犹太教,基督教和伊斯兰教,属于属一神论文明,与世俗文明相当接近,印度教及佛教则过于脱世,远离凡尘,一切均是空。故印度文明与西方文明相距最远。除非全球文明达到相当高度,否则西方文明必然居主导地位,唯有当全球人类文明均达到非常高的水准之后,亦即全球各种族民族之间的差别消失后,印度教和佛教文明才有可能成为主流。正是在此意义上,爱因斯坦曾坦言,未来最好的宗教应当是佛教。佛教不利于国民竞争意识的培养,是导致所有的佛教国度皆经济落后,政治体制不先进的根本原因,因为在佛教看来人世间的一切均毫无意义。活在人世就是受苦,转世轮回就是无穷受苦。


简言之,将中共暴政彻底灭亡中国传统文明文化,强制用马列斯毛党奴化强暴全体国人六十三年导致之恶果归因于所谓中国文化,中国文明,中国语言的论调完全不能成立。我历来主张:在尊重继承中国传统文化文明的基础上,全面学习吸收英国,德国,法国,美国,日本及全球一切先进文化文明成果,形成新中华文化文明才是中国人民最正确的选择。这需要全体有志于改变中国的志士仁人共同努力,虚心学习研究借鉴人类社会一切文明成果,靠喊口号不可能解决任何问题,而只能导致《动物庄园》里幸福的猪们享受的:一切动物平等,但某些动物更平等。两条腿的是敌人,有翅膀的是朋友!


“反儒即反华”!东海兄如是说,至少在某种意义上确实如此。反孔是毛泽东的拿手好戏,1919年的五四运动及新文化运动其实有共产党操控的影子;1971年毛发起批林批孔运动,于是“贫下中农上讲台批判孔老夫子”成为全中国各中小学的普遍现象,当年我在长汀县东风小学就读四年级,对此记忆犹新。文革期间,北京市红卫兵奉中央文革指令专程组织大批无知的青年学生赴山东曲阜孔子家乡毁了孔林。然而我在中国的全部学生期间,包括大学四年却从未读过任何一篇孔子原著。直至大学毕业后于1985年我才买来四书五经,论语,中庸,大学,易经,道德经等中国古典并通读之,此时才发现自已受骗上当,对中国传统经典的极度无知。由我个人的经验可知:绝大多数中国人实质上终其一生从未精读过四书五经!然而,海内外一批实质上对四书五经几乎一无所知的伪基督徒及假洋鬼子却犹如那些狗屁不通的“贫下中农”在中小学课堂上批判孔夫子一样狂吠:“孔子是罪人!”1995年《律师与法制》发起民意测验:谁是汝最敬佩的人?绝大多数中国律师答:崇拜毛泽东或邓小平!吾乃唯一崇拜(实质是敬佩)孔子的中国律师!


中国传统文化精神归纳言之至少包含如下基本观念:道、德、仁、爱、义、礼、智、信、诚、忠、孝、勇;吾以为还应加上:知、勤、恒。中国人的上帝观念与天和道密切相关,老子之《道德经》,四书五经,及传统老的十三经,使中国古人崇天敬神,敬老爱幼,“天子”授命于天,凭道德仁义礼智信管国治民,若违之不及时改正,则天将另择其他人取而代之,因此古代中国大多数帝王从来不是随心所欲胡作非为之人。那种人云亦云地断言:中国几千年一成不变的专制暴政之说,至少是对中国历史的严重误读,极可能是中式共任意删改历史的恶果。


古代中国素有礼仪之邦之称,孔子认为礼乐之重要作用在于静化陶冶人之心灵,建立和谐的社会秩序,促进个人心灵宁静,进而社群达到和平共处协作互助之目的,孔子所处的时代是春秋及随后的战国,群雄并起争中原,宫庭阴谋政变层出不穷,烽火战乱不断,以致民不聊生,孔子的学说核心在于克已复礼,诚心正意,忠恕宽容,天下归仁。孔子2500多年前许多思想主张非常了不起,诸如“有教无类”,“已所不欲,忽施于人”,“朝闻道,夕死可矣”,“当仁不让吾师”,“知之为知之,不知为不知”,“学而不思则亡,思而不学则殆”,“生死由命,富贵在天”,“君子行不言之教”,”君子谋道不谋食“,”君子不忧不惧“,”仁而不忧,智而不烦,勇而不惧“,“君子喻于义,小人喻于利”,”君子忧道不患贫“,”君子践行其教,言行一致“,“君子有三畏:畏天意, 畏大人,畏圣言”,“取信于民”,。。。汉武帝采纳董仲书的建议独尊儒术,由此创造了二千年君主帝制相对稳定繁荣昌盛的超级大国之人间奇迹,孔子被国际上誉为对人类影响最大的十大思想家之一并非偶然。


我曾是中国三所重点大学的客座教授和兼职研究员,亦是公认的专家学者型的律师,然而吾得坦承:迄今我对中国博大精深的传统文化文明所知甚微,在该领域实乃才疏学浅不学无术之辈耳;但自1985年始我便自以为是正宗孔孟传人。近年来看到诸如刘晓波,刘宗正,方舟,陈凯及自封圣人之辈每每口出狂言,贱卖国人宣称“中国必须让西方列强殖民三百年!”,“不脱中国不成人”(言下之意中国人连人都不是?!)不但将中国传统文化批得一文不值,甚至将中共专制暴政的罪孽归因于中国传统文化!吾深感此辈极可能是半桶水学人,从其根本不能成立的草率推论,基本可以断言:他们对中国传统文化实质精髓及真实的中国历史的了解很可能仅是人云亦云不加认真思索考证的产物。


墨子的政治思想大原则包含许多正确的观念与主张。”上天爱民,不分其类,兼爱是也“;“当不存在法律或政府时,每个人均根据他自已的标准衡量是非”;“人人皆自以为是,他人为非,因此人们之间相互指责;”当高贵的智者管理无知的愚民时,社会即安宁和谐,反之必混乱“;“古代君王凭贤选能,否定任人唯亲,拒斥裙带关系”;”不应以官职,身份,地位高者的价值观为准,而应当以法律为准绳“;国家社会之灾莫过于一是”以大欺小,以强凌弱,以多压少;二是统治者缺仁心,人民缺忠心;父缺爱心,子缺孝心“;三是粗野的人民相互伤害刀枪毒药水淹火攻无所不用其及”;”仁义之所张,秩序之所安“;“任何正当正义的统治者,必须依上帝天道法则决策行事,不可随心所欲,不得违反天意;古代帝王往往按既定的程序,尊重传统的习俗,惯例,道德和法律的约束;他的政治理想事实上在他死后2400年,在全球初步成为现实。中国人似乎缺乏系统理论研究,思维不够严密;特别是极端自私短视的统治者往往滥用文字狱,打击抑制自由思想,因此严重抑制了中国人的思维创造力。最著名的是秦始皇之焚书坑儒,朱元章的文字狱,及清初100余年期间的几十起大规模的文字狱,而中共专制暴政的思想言论极权专制,更令古今中外一切暴政望尘莫及。中共暴政经63年铁血暴政几乎彻底摧毁了一切传统文化,道德,习俗和惯例,导致现代国人整体成为文化盲道德沦丧。


道儒释是中华古代文化最突出的代表但远非全部,孔子、孟子、荀子,老子、庄子;孙武、孙滨,谷子;商央、申不害、韩非子诸子百家,各有所长,亦有所短;老子之道,并非单纯字面意义上之路或径,道是无法明确表述的概念,天地间万事万物之母即是道;老子之道与基督教之上帝观念接近,但区别在于前者拟人化人格神,后者不具人格化意义,而是无形无相变化无穷的神;因此老子之道是能生成万事万物的元始祖,如终如一,一分为二,二分为四,四分为八,八而十六,三十二,六十四。。。即数学中的等比级数定律。由此可见,中国传统文化自始即是有神文化,而且道家之神其实与基督教,伊斯兰教及犹太教之上帝实质上是同质异名而已。


孔子孟子均不言利,西方大哲同样不言利,无论是柏拉图还是亚里士多德均耻于言利,西方新教创始人之一马汀路德同样不言利,西方唯物主义言利争利的传统实质上始于罗马皇帝皈依基督教之后,教职成为有利可图的职位,而什一税的收取,使得教会成为非常富有的财主,直至15世纪末16世纪初的利八世时代,英国皇家是屈居英国天主教会之后的第二首富。其实君子不言利不争利的传统应当作正当解释,利益本身并非罪恶,利益之争是现实问题而非价值问题,哲人们过于理想清高,故取回避而不正视之;问题在于取利的手段及运用利益之目的,才是区分小人与君子的根本分水岭;因此君子应当做的乃是建立公平公正公道的利益竞争机制,而非回避排斥一切利益。中国知识分子之过份清高虽然与孔子孟子不言利的传统价值观故然有关,但应当与时俱进,光明正大地争利,并用之为自由正义事业。


简言之,儒家并非中共暴政产生或存在的根源,那种认为儒家是中共暴政得以猖獗的似是而非的论调在海内外大行其道,恐怕其中很有中共暴政企图转移人们关注重点之意味。


recent months I have read a number of western leading history professors´ leading works about China, which proved that Chinese civilization once is much higher than the western one, before 16 century, Chinese technique and science were the most top ones in the world, only after 1800 the western civilization overpass Chinese. the reason is very complicated. one key point is that: Chinese I second to none in almost every area of the human affair which shows that all modern China become so miserable and backward, the main reason is the totalitarian dictatorship 63 years blood and iron ruling, it is none business of traditional Chinese culture and civilization.


Joseph Needham asked why if the Chinese had been so technologically creative for so very long, and if they invented so much in antiquity, why did modern science develop not in China but in Europe and the West? why was China unable to hold on to its early advantage and creative edge? why was there never a true industrial revolution in China? why was there no firm embrace of capitalism? why by the 18 century and 19 century, was China a nation known principally for being backward, hostile, and poor? how did the brilliant early nation evolve into Emersonś later booby nation?


Chinese, far from existing beyond the mainstream of human civilization, had in fact created much of it.  paper, print, gunpowder and the compass, the four inventions that Francis Bacon once famously said had most profoundly changed the world, had all been invented and first employed by the Chinese. Chinese also invented blast furnaces, arched bridges, crossbows, vaccination against smallpox, the game of chess, toilet paper, seismoscopes, wheelbarrows, stirrup, powered flight, to name a few. p.8in 12 century, China iron production was in the vicinity of 125000 tons a year, a level not reached in Europe until the eighteenth century.(p.14, John Merson, The Genius That was China: east and west in the making of the modern world, The Overlook Press NY, 1990)


Chinese, far from existing beyond the mainstream of human civilization, had in fact created much of it.  paper, print, gunpowder and the compass, the four inventions that Francis Bacon once famously said had most profoundly changed the world, had all been invented and first employed by the Chinese. Chinese also invented blast furnaces, arched bridges, crossbows, vaccination against smallpox, the game of chess, toilet paper, seismoscopes, wheelbarrows, stirrup, powered flight, to name a few. p.8in 12 century, China iron production was in the vicinity of 125000 tons a year, a level not reached in Europe until the eighteenth century.(p.14, John Merson, The Genius That was China: east and west in the making of the modern world, The Overlook Press NY, 1990)


in Tang Dynasty, not only was the civil-service examination system tightened up, but officials began gradually to replace the old aristocracy. in 11 century, 50 million population was governed by no more than 13500 officials. (Harry Gelber 2007 .48) in 1126, printed books appeared, and had an immediate impact on education and literacy(56); in Southern Song, 40-50 million souls, were still administered by a mere 13000 or so officials, 8000 of them serving in the capital. (57) by the start of the 15 century, the Chinese were not only the most advanced civilization in various industrial skills, but their naval architecture had reached the point where they could construct hundreds of ships of various sizes. (88) Qing preserved racial separation, banning intermarriage between Manchus and Chinese as well as forbidding Chinese migration into the Manchu homeland. (118)


some of the leading lights of the European Enlightenment were greatly attracted to the riches of Chinese culture, and saw China, with its rigorous examination system for officialdom, as a perfect meritocracy, Leibniz, the German philosopher thought that Chinese civic morality had major lessons for Europe and together with Western mechanical invention, might even help to found a progressive world civilisation. Goethe, the greatest Germanyś poet, was another admirer, as well as the great French writer Voltaire, who thought that China was much more civilised than barbaric Europeans; he was particularly in favour of Chinaś practical Confucian wisdom and recognition of the close connection between capacity to rule and the moral character of the ruler. Peter the Great corresponded with Leibniz about China, and Catherine the Great was in touch on the subject with Voltaire (about China). however, doubts had voiced. Montesquieu thought China was a despotic state ´whose principle is fear by the later 1600s, Russian visitors, noted the low moral qualities of the Chinese with whom they mixed every day, found them crafty and unreliable in business. (149-152)


while some westerners criticize: Bishop Berkeley in Ireland thought Confucianism was nothing more than rules of experience; it rested on no principles. Montesquieu had rejected the idea that Chinese moral systems rested on principles. Hegel especially critical, the Chinese... empire is the realm of theocratic despotism... the individual has no moral selfhood.  Adam Smith reflected on the abysmal poverty of masses of the Chinese population, the infanticide, and the isolation of the economy from the rest of the world. John Stuart Mill wrote about óriental despotism Marx and Engels criticized the 'Asiatic mode of production; Diderot, the views of academics éxiste only on paper, which tolerates anything´. Protestant missionaries Robert Morrison observed that the Chinese are generally selfish, cold-blooded and inhumane; in1803 the Russian admiral, Adam von Krusenstern account commented on the ṕurely tyrannical'government of China. (Harry Gelber, The Dragon and the Foreign Devils: China and the World, 1100 BC to the Present, Bloomsbury publishing 2007.168-69)


You are welcomed to debate this theme which is top important one about Chinese future, whether totally deny Chinese traditional culture and civilization or seriously criticize base on the true fact and evidence and with responsibility attitude to treat our common ancestor? Your comment sounds reasonable in some themes, no doubt contain some truth but too simple to explain any topic. Eastern and western culture and civilization is extremely complicated subject, nobody could debate completely or eloquently. I never deny the necessary to learn from western, by the contrary, I firmly believe that Chinese must open their mind and soul to learn from all civilization and culture in the world to improve Chinese culture and civilization. what I against is the extremely left or right to deny hundred percent of Chinese.


In Chinese world, there are a number self-respected as elite Chinese who totally deny China, cause Chinese culture, reject Chinese civilization, claim absolutely westernization, such as Hu Shi, Lu Xun, nowadays including Liu Xiaobo, FangZhou, ChenKui etc, they hate China, dislike almost everything of Chinese, they alleged that all the CCPś vilest crimes are resource from Chinese traditional culture! I have to point out these people have been misleading by the CCP rogue regime deeply with fake and deceit Chinese history. knowledge is power! without knowledge or have fake and deceit knowledge definitely will make the big mistake.
Since reading four classic books and five "bible ¨ in 1985, I firmly believed that Chinese traditional culture and civilization is one of the best in the world which is great legacy and treasure of Chinese. However, I am not expert in Chinese traditional culture simply because I have to handle legal matter first, only after exiled to Canada, I have the opportunity to study Chinese history and traditional culture again, the more I learn, the more I love China and her people.  


If I have enough time, I will write some article to express my idea and comment on Chinese culture and civilization which might have to wait for a while. anyway, I have a suggestion that one time only debate one key issue, then it might be much better for readers to learn something.


Mr. Liu Xiaopo, Liu Zhong Zhong, Fangzhou and Chen Kui, in fact, are "half-bottle" water for what they criticize of Chinese culture only proved that they know very little about the true Chinese traditional culture, the main reason is that the CCP regime make up story and deceit in all educational and textbooks or newspapers and magazine, after more than 63 years forced brain-washing, they accepted the faults fact and idea about China. It is the CCP rogue regime but Chinese traditional culture have been making modern Chinese people rotten and corruption beyond our imagination.


Thanks to the most ignorance and evilest criminal regime of the Communist party´s forced brain-washing over 60 years, Majority Chinese of today, in fact, have little true knowledge of Chinese traditional and most invaluable culture and civilization, or only have fake or deceit information, including the Noble Award of Peace winner Liu Xiaobo, and a number of prominent Chinese such as Chen Kui, in essence, is ignorance of Chinese spirit and culture! I myself, as a so-called famous ¨scholarly expert professional lawyer with 28 years practice experience, have to recognize that I know very little true Chinese culture before I was forced exiled to Canada in 2005, in my whole student life from Kindergarten to graduate from Jilin university in 1984, I never have chance to read any organic classic Chinese leading works, such as ¨four books and five classics works¨, however, in 1985 I bought all of these works and read through of them carefully and realise that they are the true treasure legacy of Chinese sages for thousands of years, which deserve every sons and daughter of Chinese respect and study forever!
The key issue that the CCP regime is the evilest criminal rogue state, I quite agree with your comment. generally speaking, I disagree with your opinion on Chinese traditional culture and civilization, and I have already written and publish a number of articles to discuss the Chinese culture and civilization. In my opinion, Chinese is second to none in almost every area, except in political theory and practice, in fact, Chinese had been number one for centuries and one day, Chinese definitely will become the fast runner again after the collapse of the vilest criminal regime. What Chinese should do is not complain our great and glorious ancestors, they deserve the greatest respect but open our mind and eye and soul to learn from all other culture and civilization, of course including western one.


Kai-Chen said that “China Needs to be Destroyed, Not Saved” 中国不是要“被救”而是要“被灭”. Using despotism to oppose despotism is a game of the morally confused and intellectually dishonest. Dynastic cycles as China has manifested for many thousands of years is a necessary product of such a perverse mindset.


Thomas G Guo: Chen Kui openly declared that ¨China need be destroyed, not be rescued", I have to point out that you are going too far! this is the evilest idea even more than the CCP rogue regime and the military Japanese, if this is your true thinking, it is proved that you are not only not a so-called anti-communist party fighter, but in essence an abettor of the CCP rogue regime, for you are helping it to demean Chinese liberty & Justice campaign, in another word, you are committing crimes. I wish it is not your true idea up to date.


it is the communist party totalitarian dictatorship regime must be destroyed, not China or Chinese must be destroyed! China as a country has been living thousands of years and she will survive forever, Chinese as a nation has been standing as one of the greatest civilization in the past thousand years, only backward in the last two hundred years, but definitely she will stand up again in the near future. anyone intended confused with the CCP rogue state with China, I doubt their purpose and intention, either they are ignorance both of Chinese and Western history, or they are evil in their mind, I could not able to imagine there is third possible situation.


John Wu alleged that ¨中国人决不求真,不发明也不去发现¨, this is nonsense. I have to point out that you are extremely ignorance of the history of science and technique as well as civilization, before 15 century, almost all important invention and discover in the world were Chinese solely contribution to the world. 17 century a great British scholar, Francis Began put it the change world three most important invention of human being are paper and print, gunfire and compose which all were invented by Chinese, not to mention hundred and thousand other inventions by Chinese. your comment I am afraid is not your own that simply copy from some strong bias and ignorance oneś judgment base upon imagination.


Lao Zi is one of the greatest philosopher in the world, Dao school focus on philosophy, Confucianism emphasis on political science and life experience, like British people. In my opinion, the main reason that Chinese seems lost or restrain their power of creativity if outside barbarian tribes attacked and occupied and slivered Chinese, such as during Mongolian and MangQing dynasty, the most serious disturb is during the CCP rogue state iron and bloody ruling 63 years, Chinese almost totally lost their human rights not to mention invention.


¨Ignorance is the enemy of Chinese, while those who are ignorance but seize state power, such as Mao, Deng, Jiang, Hu, arguably Xi Jinping are the biggest enemy of human being¨, those who absolutely deny Chinese cultural and civilisation, show little respect to their greatest ancestor, only prove their ignorance and lacking capacity in analysis of what is right and wrong. thank the totalitarian dictatorship more than 63 years forced brain-washing, the majority of current Chinese actually know very little about Chinese traditional culture and civilization. this is why the guy like Chen Kui, while has some thinking and right opinion, has so many ridicule idea and full of bias opinions. when I have time I will debate this subject in detail later. anyway, welcome anyone who thought they are the expert or anybody who care about Chinese future liberty and justice to participate public debate.


Thanks to the most ignorance and evilest criminal regime of the Communist party´s forced brain-washing over 60 years, Majority Chinese of today, in fact, have little true knowledge of Chinese traditional and most invaluable culture and civilization, or only have fake or deceit information, including the Noble Award of Peace winner Liu Xiaobo, and a number of prominent Chinese such as Chen Kui, in essence, is ignorance of Chinese spirit and culture! I myself, as a so-called famous ¨scholarly expert professional lawyer with 28 years practice experience, have to recognize that I know very little true Chinese culture before I was forced exiled to Canada in 2005, in my whole student life from Kindergarten to graduate from Jilin university in 1984, I never have chance to read any organic classic Chinese leading works, such as ¨four books and five classics works¨, however, in 1985 I bought all of these works and read through of them carefully and realise that they are the true treasure legacy of Chinese sages for thousands of years, which deserve every sons and daughter of Chinese respect and study forever!


I must recognize that I am not expert of Confucianism, for I only read through ¨Four books, and five classics¨ of sages of China, in 1985, but immediately I accepted most of the idea of Chinese wisdom and idea, only recently after find so many so-called anti-communist partyś fighters, such as Liu Xiaobo, Chen Kui, who totally deny Chinese traditional culture and civilization and want to destroy China and Chinese instead of the criminal regime of the CCP! I have to say something from my heart: I am a Chinese, I love Chinese traditional culture and civilization, while I really admire with Western culture and civilization. the evilest criminal CCP regime must go and will go forever, it is a one-way ticket for them go to hell!


we need revive of Chinese traditional culture and civilization while learning from all advanced culture and civilization of the world, especially western political and legal system, to build a freedom justice constitutional democratic federalism republic with rule of law.


those who know little knowledge(half-bottle water) always want to show they were expert and elite; that amoral and shameless guy always declared they were the model of morality, this seems the universal nomination, the best example we can easily find on facebook.com. anyone demean Chinese history are or majority period of her two thousand years history are so-called despotism, either prove he/she know almost nothing but pretend they know everything or they intently misleading people, in essence, led Chinese to hate China and her glorious traditional culture, is there any other situation? I doubt it!


Confucian's basic political idea is same as both Plato and Aristotle, they all notice that human society are hierarchy structure, and people divide into various levels, such as "top were born knowledge, second, were learn to be knowledge, and the last, even learn could not able to be knowledge"(Confucian) first degree deserve to be leader and managers, the last should be led by leader; while Plato divide people as" top were born with Gold, second born with silver, and the last born with iron" and the first degree should be King, the last, as mass be led.both Plato and Aristotle prefer Monarchy and aristocracy more than democracy, Plato even proposal communism, although only among the higher level of social class. To my best knowledge, almost all westerners have been paying the highest respect to their ancient Greece saga. at the meantime, I saw a ton of self-praise as elite Chinese scholars, "democratic fighters", or "anti-communist party evil regime fighters, totally deny the best son and one of the greatest scholars China ever have in her thousand years history!


Majority Germany support Nazi party and vote to elected Hitler to be Premier Minister, while the CCP totally destroyed Chinese traditional culture, especially Confucianism at least three times, generally speaking, any true scholar or anyone who maintain their faith to traditional culture, for example, Sun Weng and Jiang Jieshi's leadership GMT, never accepted the communist ideology at all. Chen Kui confuses the CCP rogue regime with Chinese culture and China, without any sound evidence, but in fact, help the CCP criminal regime great deal in essence!by the way, it is the CCP rogue regime committed horrible crimes, not ordinary Chinese people, the majority of them are the victim instead of persecutors; you equalize Chinese traditional culture and Chinese people with the evilest criminal regime, proved that your head is really entered too much water!- Reply to Chen Kui's comment-


then you are self-proved that you are fake-"Yang Gui Zi"! although I really look down upon fake-guy whether he is writing or black or yellow! from your essays on Chinese issues, proved that you almost know nothing of the true Chinese spirit and wisdom, but pretend you know everything. you are too proud of yourself to overpass the fundamental line and this is why you are can do so shameless and amoral committed moral crimes without considering any result, you deserve punishment instead what you alleged anything.






 楼主| 发表于 8/17/2017 18:12:58 | 显示全部楼层
These comment content lot of good ideas.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则


站内文章仅为网友提供更多信息,不代表本网站同意其说法或描述,也不构成任何建议。本网站仅为网友提供交流平台,对网友自由上传的文字和图片等,本网站
不为其版权和内容等负责。站内部分内容转载自其它社区、论坛或各种媒体,有些原作者未知。如您认为站内的某些内容属侵权,请及时与我们联络并进行处理。
关于我们|隐私政策|免责条款|版权声明|网站导航|帮助中心
道至大 道天成

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|联系我们|天易综合网 (Twitter@wolfaxcom)

GMT-5, 9/22/2017 02:50 , Processed in 0.038175 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, Apc On.

Copyright 天易网 network. All Rights Reserved.

© 2009-2015 .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表