天易网

 找回密码
 注册
楼主: 郭国汀

儒学的故事

[复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:13:18 | 显示全部楼层
you are too pride to be ridicule ! how do you know I support Mandela?! how can you compare great Chinese civilisation with Black civilisation?! you are really ignorant person indeed!it is the result of the CCP's rogue regime force brain washing and totally destroy Chinese traditional culture and moral, however, you seems never criticize the CCP but denean Chinese traditional culture?!
左丘明、司马迁到汉书的父子女三人,都是文章一代的作手(大手笔)。历朝史官,民间修史之命官,同样是大文学家,遂常合家称“文史”。正史就是信史。文章好是一回事,但总之一板一眼,少了一点吸引的花俏,文人开始另辟蹊径。六朝就出现“小说笔记”,以当时的人物掌故记叙事迹,至唐宗大盛,我们概括的称做《历代小说笔记》,就是历史小说的滥觴,算来不是正史的裨官野史,后来进一步发展为历朝演义。《三国演义》就是著名的历史小说。凡有“小说”两字,都必有创作的成分。“历史小说”一词,落点在“小说”两字,因此,除了不妨碍历史的结局,情节是可以附会、虚构的创作。《三国演义》引人入胜,就是创作的成功。就以上述的“演义”来说,伏线的情节,和《赤壁之战》有关的:庞统献计、借东风、蒋干中计、黄盖苦肉计、关羽释曹等这种关键性的情节,在正史都不存在,最多也一语带过,但《演义》所占的章节甚多。可知创作所占的比例,远远超过正史。
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:13:48 | 显示全部楼层
“欲亡其国,先亡其史”. 历史离开了真实的纪录,就不是历史。例如制造史料专以毁谤为目的,我们称为“谤书”。专制造假伪的史料的,我们称为“秽史”。都不能称历史。历史是真实的经历。中国历史过去设有史官,大数来说还不失为称职的。象太史公司马迁在汉武帝威胁下,还是秉笔直书,结果惨遭“腐刑”(又称“宫刑”)。历朝也有几个皇帝偷看过史书及身的纪录,也不敢说出去和有任何异议。可知道史官一脉相传的风骨。明太祖修元史,广邀当时文史家主修者汪克宽(字德一,祈门人)、赵仿(字子常,休宁人)等,书成,明太祖想留他们任职,都不答应,回到民间讲学。可知以前史学家不会歪曲历史,谄媚征服者。明史一直至康熙中叶,到明郑覆亡以后,才修,应诏修史以张廷玉为首(安徽桐城人),是清代大儒,是一部立论中肯的史书。清史在民国以后,以国家多故,到今天仍没有修,民间虽有,但不能算全正史。中国历朝,要到朝代完结才修,而且都很中肯,和现在的“谤书”“秽史”差得太远了,都是预设立场不忠于历史的宣传品。“欲亡其国,先亡其史”。历史对国家何等重要,歪曲历史的人,或使人看不懂历史文字的人,都是参加亡史、亡国的“先行者”,也是以“杀天下后世”。-许之远--
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:14:34 | 显示全部楼层
“四无”是南宋名臣(位至丞相——光宗年代)崔与之(字正子,諡号清献)提出的:“无以嗜色杀身,无以嗜财害命,无以政治杀人,无以学术杀天下后世。”他是广东人。在广东一地以乡贤而入从祀孔庙。我们称他崔菊坡先生。“四无”虽然是个人立身处世的戒条,但在今天以财色杀身的社会,不啻暮鼓晨钟。而政治杀人之戒,如果我们的社会,在上者能遵守,说之不尽的枉死、冤死和许多未经合法审判的滥杀就可以避免,当年草菅人命的某些运动就可以中止。学术杀天下后世更严重,不但杀当代,还杀后人,所有邪说的著作、哲学思想、逻辑思维都是这一项归类。读者清明,自可以判断。崔公真是仁者怀抱了!“四无”属戒条,在今天看来,还有积极的心防作用。另一个“四为”看似“作为”,但其实才是消极的:“为书尤蠧,为月尤云;为花尤风雨;为才子佳人尤命薄。”是张潮说的,他是个菩萨心肠的人。-许之远--
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:18:51 | 显示全部楼层
It is you who repeatedly praise Lu Xun,and a number fake scholar who support the evilest CCP regime. if there is anyone who is stupid or foolish, I am afraid it is you!
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:19:09 | 显示全部楼层
Mr.Huang Jingqiu is a outstanding young writer who has much better academic and critical thinking capability than majority of modern Chinese, I agree with his judgement of Lu Xun, while Liu Xiaopo, Yu Jie, Chen Kai and a number of so-called christian love him so much!
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:19:44 | 显示全部楼层
Chinese full of fake Christian but lacking real one, those totally deny Chinese traditional culture so-called Christian, in my eye are only shallow half-bottle one who know little knowledge of civilization of both China and the world.
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:20:01 | 显示全部楼层
to my understanding, the idealism of the enlightenment is freedom, mainly free from the thought constrained, especially from church, liberate human being's spirit, rely on human being but on any other man made bar. in another word, man become a free man in thinking and creativity, humanitarian become Westerners mainly idea since 18 century. It is after the Renaissance and the reform of church and industrial revolution, the revolution in mankind's mind and spirit.
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:20:49 | 显示全部楼层
胡适院长邀请蒋介石出席,蒋介石就讲话,讲话里批评了“新文化运动”,批评“打倒孔家店”这样的口号,蒋介石讲话以后,胡适发言,第一句话就是“总统您错了”,当面驳斥了蒋介石,所以蒋介石在日记里写,他最不喜欢胡适,而且以后最不愿意见到胡适,但是尽管如此,蒋介石在胡适死的时候,还是对胡适做了一个比较合适的、比较恰当的评价。

在此问题上,恰恰证实蒋介石才是真正的伟人,胡适反孔反中华传统文化才真正反错了!
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:21:18 | 显示全部楼层
politician in essence are same, justice is nothing, but interest control everything, this is human nature. the true justice fighter always meet the most injustice. thus, to judge a person should not only according to what he has said, but what he has done.
 楼主| 发表于 1/26/2014 07:23:41 | 显示全部楼层
Frankly speaking, you know very little Chinese and world history, I am not arrogant but might be one of the modest Chinese. You do not know me, not to say understand me.Professor Chang has been progressing a lots recent years, in 2006 I criticize his comment on FLG, he soon correct his mistake which prove that he can accept reasonable criticize. in fact, last year, in my open letter to Mr. Xi Jiping, I strongly recommend Xi to use a number of true legal scholars, such as He Weifang, Liu Jingning and Chang Qianfang. I agree most of the arguments only few point deserve debate, such as Revolution, his attitude to Confucian basically is same as mine. General speaking, this is a good speech and well worth every Chinese watch.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则


站内文章仅为网友提供更多信息,不代表本网站同意其说法或描述,也不构成任何建议。本网站仅为网友提供交流平台,对网友自由上传的文字和图片等,本网站
不为其版权和内容等负责。站内部分内容转载自其它社区、论坛或各种媒体,有些原作者未知。如您认为站内的某些内容属侵权,请及时与我们联络并进行处理。
关于我们|隐私政策|免责条款|版权声明|网站导航|帮助中心
道至大 道天成

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|联系我们|天易综合网 (Twitter@wolfaxcom)

GMT-5, 11/18/2019 02:22 , Processed in 0.155264 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright 天易网 network. All Rights Reserved.

© 2009-2015 .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表